On-Road Glance Monitoring & Driver Behavior Study

Introduction:

While vehicle malfunctions are easy to diagnose after a crash, diagnosing driver failure is significantly more difficult. This study investigates how recent advances in glance-monitoring technologies allow researchers to measure latent cognitive processes by tracking exactly where a driver looks and for how long. The purpose of this research is to identify the capabilities of various eye-tracking systems and describe their application in identifying skill deficiencies in novice and older drivers, evaluating the efficacy of training programs, and assessing in-vehicle interface safety. The study seeks to provide a theoretical understanding of driver behavior to improve overall road user safety.

Methodology:

The researchers utilized a review of field studies employing various technologies, including head-mounted eye trackers (HM-ET), vehicle-mounted face cameras (VM-FC), and combined scene camera systems. The research design focused on measuring eye behaviors on the open road to ensure ecological validity. Participant characteristics spanned several cohorts, including younger novice drivers, middle-aged experienced drivers, older drivers (ages 65–80), and motorcycle riders. Data collection involved recording fixation locations, fixation durations, and scanning patterns (horizontal and vertical variability) during real-world driving scenarios. Analytical methods included comparing the frequency of glances toward critical hazard locations—such as intersections and latent threats—and assessing “eyes-off-the-road” time during distracting tasks.

Results:

The findings revealed that experienced drivers adjust their scanning patterns based on roadway demands, whereas novice drivers do not, often failing to anticipate “latent” hazards. For instance, experienced drivers anticipated 92% of latent hazards in one study, compared to only 47% for novices. Older drivers were found to be significantly less likely to check for cross traffic at intersections, spending only 19% of their time looking left during turns compared to 38% for middle-aged drivers.

The study also demonstrated that computer-based training can significantly remediate these deficits; trained novices increased their hazard anticipation from 47% to 66%, an effect that persisted for up to a year. Similarly, active training for older drivers nearly doubled their secondary looks for threats at intersections. Regarding in-vehicle technology, the study found that while backing-collision cameras can reduce crashes, 80% of drivers failed to even look at the camera feed, leading to higher crash rates with decoys. Finally, cognitive distractions, such as hands-free cell phone use, were shown to narrow a driver’s gaze and reduce the frequency of mirror and instrument checks.

References

1. Ball, K.K., Ackerman, M.L., 2011. The older driver (training and assessment: knowledge, skills and attitudes). In: Fisher, D., Rizzo, M., Caird, J., Lee, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Driving Simulation for Engineering, Medicine and Psychology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
2. Bao, S., Boyle, L.N., 2009. Age-related differences in visual scanning at median-divided highway intersections in rural areas. Accident Analysis & Prevention 41 (1), 146–152.
3. Beijer, D., Smiley, A., Eizenman, M., 2004. Observed driver glance behavior at roadside advertising signs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1899 (1), 96–103.
4. Borowsky, A., Shinar, D., Oron-Gilad, T., 2010. Age, skill, and hazard perception in driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention 42, 1240–1249.
5. Broadbent, D.E., 1958. Perception and Communication. Pergamon Press.
6. Brown, I.D., 2002. A Review of the ‘Look But Failed to See’ Accident Causation Factor. Behavioural Research in Road Safety XI. Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, London.
7. Chapman, P.R., Underwood, G., 1998. Visual search of driving situations: danger and experience. Perception 27, 951–964.
8. Chapman, P., Underwood, G., Roberts, K., 2002. Visual search patterns in trained and untrained novice drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 5 (2), 157–167.
9. Clarke, D., Ward, P., Bartle, C., Truman, W., 2010. Older drivers’ road traffic crashes in the UK. Accident Analysis and Prevention 42 (4), 1018–1024.
10. Crundall, D.E., Underwood, G., 1998. Effects of experience and processing demands information acquisition in drivers. Ergonomics 41, 448–458.
11. Crundall, D., Underwood, G., 2011. Visual attention while driving: measures of eye movements used in driving research. In: Porter, B.E. (Ed.), Handbook of Traffic Psychology. Elsevier, pp. 137–148.
12. Crundall, D., Van Loon, E., Underwood, G., 2006. Attraction and distraction of attention with roadside advertisements. Accident Analysis and Prevention 38 (4), 671–677.
13. Crundall, D., Crundall, E., Clarke, D., Shahar, A., 2012. Why do car drivers fail to give way to motorcycles at T-junctions? Accident Analysis and Prevention 44, 88–96.
14. Crundall, D., Chapman, P., Phelps, N., Underwood, G., 2003. Eye movements and hazard perception in police pursuit and emergency response driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 9 (3), 163.
15. Dingus, T.A., Hulse, M.C., Antin, J.F., Wierwille, W.W., 1989. Attentional demand requirements of an automobile moving-map navigation system. Transportation Research Part A: General 23 (4), 301–315.
16. Divekar, G., Pradhan, A.K., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D.L., 2012. Effect of external distractions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2321 (1), 15–22.
17. Falkmer, T., Gregersen, N.P., 2005. A comparison of eye movement behavior of inexperienced and experienced drivers in real traffic environments. Optometry and Vision Science 82, 732–739.
18. Fenton, S., Scaife, E., Meyers, R., et al., 2005. The prevalence of driveway back-over injuries in the era of sports utility vehicles. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 40, 1964–1968.
19. Fisher, D.L., Pollatsek, A., Horrey, W., 2011a. Eye behaviors: how driving simulators can expand their role in science and engineering. In: Fisher, D., Rizzo, M., Caird, J., Lee, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Driving Simulation for Engineering, Medicine and Psychology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
20. Fisher, D., Rizzo, M., Caird, J., Lee, J. (Eds.), 2011b. Handbook of Driving Simulation for Engineering, Medicine and Psychology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
21. Fisher, D.L., Pradhan, A.K., Pollatsek, A., Knodler Jr., M.A., 2007. Empirical evaluation of hazard anticipation behaviors in the field and on a driving simulator using an eye tracker. In: Proceedings of the 86th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting CD-ROM, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C..
22. Garay-Vega, L., Fisher, D.L., Knodler, M., 2008. Evaluation of drivers performance in response to sight-limited crash scenarios at midblock crosswalks: benefits of advance yield markings and symbolic signage. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meetings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, New York, New York.
23. Gomez, R., Samuel, S., Roman Gerardino, L., Romoser, M.R.E., Fisher, D.L., 2011. Do advance yield markings increase safe driver behaviors at unsignalized, marked midblock crosswalks: a simulator study. Transportation Research Record 2264, 27–33.
24. Hakamies-Blomqvist, L., Sirén, A., Davidse, R., 2004. Older Drivers: A Review. VTI Rapport 497A.
25. Hancock, P.A., Sheridan, T.B., 2011. The future of driving simulation. In: Fisher, D., Rizzo, M., Caird, J., Lee, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Driving Simulation for Engineering, Medicine and Psychology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
26. Harbluk, J.L., Noy, Y.I., Trbovich, P.L., Eizenman, M., 2007. An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers’ visual behavior and braking performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention 39 (2), 372–379.
27. Henderson, J.M., 1993. Eye movement control during visual object processing: effects of initial fixation position and semantic constraint. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 47, 79–98.
28. Horrey, W.J., Wickens, C.D., 2007. In-vehicle glance duration distributions, tails, and model of crash risk. Transportation Research Record 2018, 22–28.
29. Horswill, M.S., McKenna, F.P., 2004. Drivers’ hazard perception ability: situation awareness on the road. In: Banbury, S., Tremblay, S. (Eds.), A Cognitive Approach to Situation Awareness. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK, pp. 155–175.
30. Hurwitz, D.S., Pradhan, A.K., Fisher, D.L., Knodler, M.A., Muttart, J.W., Menon, R., Meissner, U., 2010. Backing collisions: a study of drivers’ eye and backing behavior using combined rear-view camera and sensor systems. Injury Prevention 16, 79–84.
31. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 2004. Fatality Facts 2004: older people [online]..
32. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 2009. Fatality facts 2009: older people.
33. ISO, 2002a. International Standard 15007-1: Road Vehicles – Measurement of Driver Visual Behaviour with Respect to Transport Information and Control Systems – Part 1: Definitions and Parameters.
34. ISO, 2002b. International Standard 15007-1: Road Vehicles – Measurement of Driver Visual Behaviour with Respect to Transport Information and Control Systems – Part 2: Equipment and Procedures.
35. Klauer, S.G., Dingus, T.A., Neale, V.L., Sudweeks, J.D., Ramsey, D.J., 2006. The Impact of Driver Inattention On Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data. DOT HS 810 594, NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation.
36. Langham, M., 1999. An Investigation of the Role of Vehicle Conspicuity in the ‘Looked but Failed to See’ Error in Driving. University of Sussex, Sussex.
37. Lee, S.E., Olsen, E.C.B., Simons-Morton, B., 2006. Eye glance behavior of novice teen and experienced adult drivers. Transportation Research Record 1980, 57–64.
38. Liang, Y., Lee, J.D., Yekhshatyan, L., 2012. How dangerous is looking away from the road? Algorithms predict crash risk from glance patterns in naturalistic driving. Human Factors 54, 1104–1116.
39. Luoma, J., 1988. Drivers’ eye fixations and perceptions. In: Gale, A.G., Freeman, M.H., Haslegrave, C.M., Smith, P., Taylor, S.P. (Eds.), Vision in Vehicles II. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 231–237.
40. Mayhew, D.R., Simpson, H.M., 2002. The safety value of driver education and training. Injury Prevention 8 (Suppl. II), ii3–ii8.
41. Mayhew, D.R., Simpson, H.M., Ferguson, S.A., 2006. Collisions involving senior drivers: high-risk conditions and locations. Traffic Injury Prevention 7, 117–124.
42. McKnight, J.A., McKnight, S.A., 2003. Young novice drivers: careless or clueless. Accident Analysis and Prevention 35, 921–925.
43. McLaughlin, S.B., Hankey, J.M., Green, C.A., et al., 2003. Driver performance evaluation of two rear parking aids. In: Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles.
44. Minnesota Department of Highways, 1951. Minnesota Rural Trunk Highway Accident, Access Point and Advertising Sign Study. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
45. Mourant, R.R., Rockwell, T.H., 1972. Strategies of visual search by novice and experienced drivers. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 14 (4), 325–335.
46. Mourant, R.R., Rockwell, T.H., 1970. Visual information seeking of novice drivers. SAE Paper 700397.
47. Muttart, J.W., Peck, L.R., Guderian, S., Bartlett, W., Ton, L.P., Kauderer, C., Fisher, D.L., Manning, J.E., 2011. Motorcycle rider glance and stopping behavior at intersections: it’s time to put our foot down. In: Transportation Research Record.
48. Nichols, J.L., 2003. A Review of the History and Effectiveness of Driver Education and Training as a Traffic Safety Program. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, D.C..
49. Nieminen, T., Summala, H., 1994. Novice and experienced drivers’ looking behaviour and primary task control while doing a secondary task. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting.
50. Nunes, L., Recarte, M.A., 2002. Cognitive demands of hands-free-phone conversation while driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 5 (2), 133–144.
51. Pollatsek, A.P., Romoser, M.R.E., Fisher, D.L., 2012. Identifying and remediating failures of selective attention in older drivers. Current Directions in Psychology 21, 3–7.
52. Pradhan, A.K., Hammel, K.R., DeRamus, R., Pollatsek, A., Noyce, D.A., Fisher, D.L., 2005. The use of eye movements to evaluate the effects of driver age on risk perception in an advanced driving simulator. Human Factors 47, 840–852.
53. Pradhan, A.K., Pollatsek, A., Knodler, M., Fisher, D.L., 2009. Can younger drivers be trained to scan for information that will reduce their risk in roadway traffic scenarios that are hard to identify as hazardous? Ergonomics 52, 657–673.
54. Pradhan, A.K., Divekar, G., Masserang, K., Romoser, M., Zafian, T., Blomberg, R.D., Thomas, F.D., Reagan, I., Knodler, M., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D.L., 2011. The effects of focused attention training (FOCAL) on the duration of novice drivers’ glances inside the vehicle. Ergonomics 54, 917–931.
55. Rayner, K., 2009. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Psychology 62, 1457–1506.
56. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., 1989. The Psychology of Reading. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
57. Regan, M.A., Lee, J.D., Young, K.L., 2008. Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects, and Mitigation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FA.
58. Recarte, M.A., Nunes, L.M., 2003. Mental workload while driving: effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 9, 119–137.
59. Rockwell, T.H., 1972. Skills, judgment and information acquisition in driving. In: Forbes, T.W. (Ed.), Human Factors in Highway Traffic Safety Research. Wiley, New York, pp. 133–164.
60. Romoser, M.R.E., 2012. The long-term effects of active training strategies on improving older drivers’ scanning in intersections: a two-year follow-up to Romoser and Fisher (2009). Human Factors 54 (4), 485–674.
61. Romoser, M., Fisher, D.L., 2009. The effect of active versus passive training strategies on improving older drivers’ scanning for hazards while negotiating intersections. Human Factors 51, 652–668.
62. Romoser, M.R.E., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D.L., Williams, C.C., 2013. Comparing the glance patterns of older versus younger experienced drivers: Scanning for hazards while approaching and entering the intersection. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 16, 104–116.
63. Senders, J.W., Kristofferson, A.B., Levison, W.H., Dietrich, C.W., Ward, J.L., 1967. The attentional demand of automobile driving. Highway Research Record 195, 15–33.
64. Shinar, D., 2008. Looks are (almost) everything: where drivers look to get information. Human Factors 50, 380–384.
65. Smiley, A., Smahel, T., Eizenman, M., 2004. Impact of video advertising on driver fixation patterns. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1899 (1), 76–83.
66. Society of Automotive Engineers, 2001. Measurement of Driver Visual Behavior Using Video Based Methods (SAE Recommended Practice J2396).
67. Snyder, M.B., 1972. Traffic engineering for pedestrian safety: some new data and solutions. Highway Research Records 406, 21–27.
68. Sodhi, M., Reimer, B., Llamazares, I., 2002. Glance analysis of driver eye movements to evaluate distraction. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 34, 529–538.
69. Strayer, D.L., Cooper, J., Drews, F.A., 2011. Profiles in cell phone-induced driver distraction. In: Handbook of Driving Simulation for Engineering, Medicine and Psychology. CRC Press.
70. Strayer, D.L., Drews, F.A., Johnston, W.A., 2003. Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 9 (1), 23.
71. Taylor, T.G.G., Masserang, K.M., Pradhan, A.K., Divekar, G., Samuel, S., Muttart, J.W., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D.L., 2011. Long Term Effects of Hazard Anticipation Training on Novice Drivers Measured on the Open Road.
72. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2012. Official U.S. Government website for distracted driving.
73. Underwood, G., Chapman, P., Bowden, K., Crundall, D., 2002. Visual search while driving: skill and awareness during inspection of the scene. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 5 (2), 87–97.
74. Van Houten, R., Malenfant, J.E.L., McCusker, D., 2001. Advance yield markings reduce motor vehicle/pedestrian conflicts at multilane crosswalks with an uncontrolled approach. Transportation Research Record 1773, 69–74.
75. Wierwille, W.W., Antin, J.F., Dingus, T.A., Hulse, M.C., 1998. Visual attentional demand of an in-car navigation display system. In: Vision in Vehicles II. North Holland Press.
76. Wikman, A., Nieminen, T., Summala, H., 1998. Driving experience and time-sharing during in-car tasks on roads of different width. Ergonomics 41, 358–372.
77. Williams, A.F., 2003. Teenage drivers: patterns of risk. Journal of Safety Research 34 (3), 5–15.
78. Wisconsin Department of Transportation District 2, Freeway Operations Unit, 1994. Milwaukee County Stadium Variable Message Sign Study.
79. Zwahlen, H.T., Adams Jr., C.C., Debald, D.P., 1988. Safety aspects of CRT touch panel controls in automobiles. In: Vision in Vehicles II. Elsevier.

Analogy for understanding: Utilizing glance-monitoring technology in driving research is much like installing a “black box” for the human mind. Just as a flight recorder tells us what a plane did, these tools tell us what the driver was actually processing—revealing that crashes often happen not because the driver couldn’t see, but because their “internal radar” was simply looking in the wrong place at the wrong time.