Anticipatory Glancing and Risk Mitigation in Novice vs. Experienced Drivers

Introduction:

Novice drivers, particularly those aged 16 and 17, are significantly overrepresented in run-off-road (ROR) crashes, often due to improper speed selection when entering curves. Research indicates that while the accident rate on curves is three times higher than on straight segments, anticipating hazards and slowing down before entering the “critical region” (three seconds before the curve) is the optimal safety solution. This study aimed to determine if novice drivers’ high crash rates stem from a failure to anticipate hazards (not looking ahead) or a failure to mitigate hazards (seeing the curve but failing to slow down). The researchers hypothesized that experienced drivers would make more anticipatory glances and that novices would fail to slow down more often, leading to increased crash risks.

Methodology:

The study utilized a fixed-based driving simulator equipped with an ASL MobileEye eye tracker to monitor the gaze of two distinct participant groups: 18 novice drivers (ages 16–18, licensed for approximately 2.6 months) and 18 “exemplary” experienced drivers (ages 26–61, licensed for over 10 years with no at-fault crashes or violations). Participants navigated a 36-minute simulated drive featuring a variety of road geometries, including a moderate left curve and a tightening right curve.

Researchers measured eye fixation locations, lane positions, and vehicle velocity, specifically focusing on “far extent glances” (looking across the inside of the curve to the road ahead) and “target speeds” (calculated speed reductions required for safe navigation). Data were analyzed in one-second increments for the ten seconds leading up to the apex of each curve.

Results:

The findings revealed significant differences in how experienced and novice drivers handle curves:

• Hazard Anticipation: Experienced drivers were significantly more likely to glance toward the far extent of the curve five to six seconds before reaching it. In the moderate left curve, 56% of experienced drivers made anticipatory glances compared to only 25% of novices.
• Hazard Mitigation: Experienced drivers began slowing to the target speed significantly earlier (three seconds before the curve) than novices. Overall, 20% fewer novices slowed to the required target speed for the sharp right curve.
• Conditional Behavior: The data showed that slowing is strongly associated with glancing; however, even when novice drivers did glance at the curve, they only slowed down 67% of the time, compared to a 90% slowing rate for experienced drivers who glanced.
• Safety Outcomes: At the sharp right curve, six novice drivers crashed, whereas only two experienced drivers crashed. Notably, 100% of the experienced drivers who did not crash had both glanced and slowed, while only one novice driver who both glanced and slowed avoided a crash.
• Lane Positioning: Experienced drivers consistently selected safer lane positions, moving toward the outside of the curve earlier to optimize their path.

The study concludes that novice drivers struggle both with anticipating the curve and with taking appropriate action once they recognize it, suggesting a need for specialized hazard mitigation training.

References

1. Anderson, I. B., & Krammes, R. A. (2000). Speed reduction as a surrogate for accident experience at horizontal curves on rural two-lane roads. Transportation Research Record 1701. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
2. Bonneson, J. A., & Pratt, M. P. (2009). A model for predicting speed along horizontal curves on two-lane highways. Paper No. 09-1419. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
3. Fatal Accident Reporting System [FARS]. (2012). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
4. Fisher, D. L. (2008). Evaluation of PC-Based Novice Driver Risk Awareness DOT HS 810 926. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
5. Fisher, D. L., Laurie, N. E., Glaser, R., Connerney, K., Pollatsek, A., Duffy, S. A., & Brock, J. (2002). The use of an advanced driving simulator to evaluate the effects of training and experience on drivers’ behavior in risky traffic scenarios. Human Factors, 44, 287-302.
6. Glennon, J. C., Neuman, T. R., & Leisch, J. T. (1983). Safety and operational considerations for design of rural highway curves, (DOT – FH – 11 – 9575). McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration.
7. Land, M. F., & Lee, D. N. (1994). Where we look when we steer. Nature, 369(6483), 742-744.
8. Maeda, T., Irie, N., Hidaka, K., & Nishimura, H. (1977). Performance of driver-vehicle system in emergency avoidance. Technical paper 770130. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
9. Mikolajetz, A., Henning, M. J., Tenzer, A., Zobel, R., Krems, J. F., & Petzoldt, T. (2009). Curve negotiation: identifying driver behavior around curves with the driver performance database. Proceedings of the fifth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 391-397.
10. Muttart, J. W. (2013). Identifying hazard mitigation behaviors that lead to differences in the crash risk between experienced and novice drivers (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
11. Pollatsek, A., Narayanaan, V., Pradhan, A., & Fisher, D. L. (2006). Using eye movements to evaluate a PC-based risk awareness and perception training program on a driving simulator. Human Factors, 48, 447-464.
12. Pradhan, A. K., Fisher, D. L., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). Risk perception training for novice drivers: Evaluating duration of effects on a driving simulator. Transportation Research Record, 1969, 58-64.
13. Suh, W., Park, P., Park, Y-C., Park, C. H., & Chon, K. S. (2006). Relationship between speed, lateral placement, and drivers’ eye movement at two-lane rural highways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 132, 649-653.
14. Taylor, T., Masserang, K., Divekar, G., Samuel, S., Muttart, J., Pollatsek, A., & Fisher, D. L. (2011). Long-term effects of hazard anticipation training on novice drivers measured on the open road. 6th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design.
15. Zegeer, C., Stewart, R., Reinfurt, D., Council, F. M., Neuman, T., Hamilton, E., Miller, T., & Hunter, W. (1990). Cost effective geometric improvements for safety upgrading of horizontal curves. Publication No. FHWA-RD-90-021. University of North Carolina, Highway Safety Research Center.

To better understand these findings, consider the difference between a novice and a master chess player. The master player looks several moves ahead (hazard anticipation) and adjusts their strategy immediately to avoid a trap (hazard mitigation). The novice may only look at the piece currently being moved, or even if they see the potential trap, they may not yet have the experience to know exactly how to change their play to avoid it. Similarly, “exemplary” drivers look far down the road to spot curves early and begin slowing long before the “trap” of the curve’s apex.