Impact of Taillight Brightness on Closing Speed Perception

Introduction Summary

Rear-end collisions account for a substantial percentage of fatal crashes in the United States. These crashes are not all the same; some may be caused by simple human error, while others are attributed to a fundamental human difficulty in accurately recognizing closing speed and closing distance in complex traffic environments.

The purpose of this study was to examine how the brightness of a lead vehicle’s taillights affects an observer’s ability to accurately perceive three key factors:

1. Whether a vehicle is closing (moving closer) or separating (moving away).
2. The distance to the lead vehicle.
3. The speed at which the vehicles are closing.

The study used video simulations to compare responses to bright taillights (representing new or clean lights) versus dimmer taillights (80% dimmer, typical of older or aged lights).

Methodology Summary

The research was conducted using a controlled video experiment presented to a group of observers.

Stimuli and Scenarios

Observers were shown two-dimensional, four-second video clips simulating a subject vehicle closing on a slow-moving lead vehicle on an unlit highway.

The clips varied across three independent variables:

1. Initial Distance: The lead vehicle was positioned at one of three distances: 91 m (300 ft), 128 m (420 ft), or 152 m (500 ft).
2. Closing Speed: Two closing speeds were tested: 40 km/h (25 mph) or 105 km/h (65 mph).
3. Taillight Brightness: The lead vehicle’s taillights were shown as either bright (100% brightness) or dim (80% dimmer).

Tasks and Measures

After viewing each clip, observers were asked to perform three specific tasks to gauge their perception:

1. Closing vs. Separating: Identify whether the lead vehicle was moving closer or further away.
2. Estimate Distance: Estimate the initial distance to the lead vehicle.
3. Estimate Closing Speed: Estimate the closing speed of the vehicle.

Results Summary

The results confirmed that a reduction in taillight brightness, as is common with aging vehicles, significantly impairs a driver’s ability to accurately perceive closure dynamics, especially at greater distances.

Recognition of Closing vs. Separating

The ability of observers to correctly recognize whether the vehicle was closing or separating was significantly impaired by three factors:

• Increased Distance: Performance worsened as the initial distance to the vehicle increased.
• Dimmer Taillights: Observers performed significantly worse with the 80% dimmer taillights.
• Lower Closing Speeds: The ability to perceive closure worsened at the lower 40 km/h closing speed.

Estimation of Distance

In estimating the initial distance:

• Observers consistently perceived brighter taillights to be closer than dimmer taillights, even when the actual distance was the same.
• At the greater distances (128 m and 152 m), observers showed a strong tendency to underestimate the distance.

Estimation of Closing Speed

In estimating the closing speed:

• At the two farthest distances (128 m and 152 m), observers consistently underestimated the actual closing speed.
• Crucially, at the two farthest distances, observers frequently did not recognize that the vehicle was closing at all when the taillights were dim.

The study concludes that the brightness of a lead vehicle’s taillights is a highly influential factor in a driver’s ability to accurately assess crash-critical kinematic variables like closing speed and distance. Dimmer lights increase the risk of misjudgment and, therefore, the risk of a rear-end collision.

References Cited

• Braun, C., G. T. D. & J. D. Lee. (2014). The effect of time-based alerts and task-load on driver perception-response time and braking profiles in a forward collision warning scenario. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 64, 1-11.
• Burger, W. J., F. D. Smith, & R. L. Sharkey. (1988). The Effect of Taillight Color on Reaction Time. SAE Technical Paper 880290.
• Chang, J. M., R. G. H. R., & S. H. S. (2018). The effect of the size and color of the lead vehicle’s tail light on the braking of the following driver. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 111, 237-246.
• Dinakar, S., Muttart, J. W., Garrison, T., Gernhard, S., & Marr, J. (2018). Influence of Taillight Brightness on the Ability to Recognize Closing Speed, Closing Distance, and Closing vs. Separating. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2018 Annual Meeting.
• Fisher, D. L., E. L. Reisinger, & B. E. G. (2010). Effects of age and distractions on simulated driving performance. Human Factors, 52(6), 668-682.
• Muttart, J. W. (2005). Quantifying driver response times based upon research and real-life data. SAE Technical Paper No. 2005-01-0427.
• O’Shea, R. P., Blackburn, S. G., & Ono, H. (1994). Contrast as a depth cue. Vision research, 34(12), 1595-1604.
• Reason, J. Human Error: Models and management, Western Journal of Medicine. 2000 Jun; 172(6): 393-396.
• Sorock, G. S., Ranney, T. A., Lehto, M. R. (1996). Motor vehicle crashes in roadway construction workzones: an analysis using narrative text from insurance claims, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 28, 131-138.
• Summala, H., Lamble, D., & Laakso, M. (1998). Driving experience and perception of the lead car’s braking when looking at in-car targets, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 30, 401-407.
• Terry, H. R., Charlton, S.G. and Perrone, J.A. (2008). The role of looming and attention capture in drivers braking responses. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(4), 1375-1382.
• Victor, T., Dozza, M., Bärgman, J., Boda, C.-N., Engström, J., Flannagan, C., Lee, J. D., Markkula, G. (2015). Analysis of Naturalistic Driving Study Data: Safer Glances and Increased Following Distance in Vehicles with Forward Collision Warning. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 81, 102-111.