Timed Exposure vs. SHRP-2 Nighttime Driver Recognition

Introduction Summary

Collision statistics reveal that more than half of all pedestrian fatalities involving vehicles occur at night. This fact underscores the critical role of nighttime object recognition in preventing pedestrian accidents. Previous research, notably a series of studies conducted by Richard Blackwell from the 1950s through 1970s, evaluated whether a restricted viewing time could effectively serve as a surrogate for the imperfect information available to drivers during night driving.

This study builds upon these findings by incorporating modern methods of hazard analysis and comparing them with the Perception-Response Times (PRTs) derived from the Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP-2) Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS) database. The primary goal was to validate the use of a timed-exposure methodology for measuring hazard recognition under controlled conditions, thereby improving the ability of researchers to determine appropriate response times for drivers facing hazards at night.

Methodology Summary

The research involved a laboratory-based timed-exposure study that required participants to identify potential hazards, specifically pedestrian targets, under highly controlled conditions.

• Participants: Included three age groups: Younger Drivers (18-25 years old), Middle-Aged Drivers (40-49 years old), and Older Drivers (65-79 years old).
• Stimuli: The observers were shown slides containing targets (such as pedestrians) that were visible for a limited duration—the timed exposure—which varied from 0.05 seconds to 0.4 seconds. The luminance of the targets was also varied, ranging from approximately $0.003 \text{ cd}/\text{m}^2$ to $0.3 \text{ cd}/\text{m}^2$.
• Key Measures: The study measured the recognition time of the targets based on the minimum exposure duration required for correct identification. This recognition time was then compared to Perception-Response Times (PRTs) derived from real-world, nighttime crash and near-crash events involving single vehicles in the SHRP-2 NDS database. The PRTs from the SHRP-2 data were based on the time between the point of first possible hazard recognition and the driver’s first physical response (e.g., braking or swerving).

Results Summary

The comparison between the laboratory-based timed-exposure data and the real-world SHRP-2 NDS data showed strong agreement, successfully validating the use of the timed-exposure methodology for determining appropriate PRTs in nighttime conditions.

• Validation: The PRTs calculated using the timed-exposure method, when extrapolated to common night driving luminances, were found to be statistically comparable to the average PRTs observed in the SHRP-2 NDS database for similar nighttime single-vehicle crash and near-crash events.
• Age Effects: The study found a significant influence of age on the required exposure time for recognition. Older observers required longer exposure times to correctly identify targets, especially at lower luminance levels. This is consistent with the established knowledge that older drivers experience a reduction in visual performance, particularly when detecting low-contrast objects at night.
• Implications for PRT: The findings support the use of longer PRTs for older drivers in nighttime scenarios. For instance, the recognition time (and thus the PRT) needed to avoid a low-luminance hazard could be nearly double that required by younger drivers. This is crucial for crash reconstruction and the design of advanced vehicle safety systems.

References Cited

• Baker, J. and Steenson, E. (1998). The Influence of Age on Pedestrian-Vehicle Accidents (Report No. HS-806-735). Washington, D.C.: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
• Blackwell, H. R. (1946). Contrast thresholds of the human eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 36(11), 624-643.
• Blackwell, H. R. (1959). Vision aspects of lighting research. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry, 36(12), 651-683.
• Blackwell, H. R. (1970). Visual detection and identification during road driving. Highway Research Record, (336).
• Blackwell, H. R., & Taylor, W. K. (1972). A unified quantitative theory of visual performance and its application to lighting engineering. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 2(3), 209-223.
• Broen, N. (1996). Braking Response Times for 100 Drivers in the Avoidance of an Unexpected Obstacle as Measured in a Driving Simulator. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
• Forbes, T. W. (1972). The role of human factors in accident research. Highway Research Record, (336).
• McGehee, D. V., & Mazzae, E. N. (1998). Driver reaction time in crash avoidance research: Validation of a driving simulator study on a test track. Society of Automotive Engineers.
• Muttart, J. W. (2005). Quantifying Driver Response Times Based Upon Research and Real-Life Data (SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0427). Society of Automotive Engineers.
• Muttart, J., Dinakar, S., Suway, J., Kuzel, M., Lohf, D., Maloney, T., & Wheat, A. (2017). Is a Protocol for Measuring Age Retroreflective Sheeting Warranted? Retroreflectivity Measurements from 191 Trailers from 36 States (Transportation Research Board Paper 17-06767).
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2015). Fatal traffic crashes on US roadways and the effects of driver inexperience. DOT HS 812 189.
• Olson, P. L., Campbell, K., Massie, D., Battle, D. S., Traube, E. C., Aoki, T., Sato, T., & Pettis, L. C. (1992). Performance requirements for large truck and conspicuity enhancements (Report No. UMTRI-92-8). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
• Perchonok, K. (1972). Accident cause analysis. Highway Research Record, (336).
• Shinar, D. (1993). Traffic safety and human behavior. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
• Straub, H. (1977). Road User Characteristics and Behaviour. OECD.
• Visual-Age, Version 2.0: A PC based software package for computing the effects of age on the visual abilities required for driving. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.